THE MAGNETIC HEALTH QUARTERLYBYWILLIAM H. PHILPOTT, M.D.CANCER PREVENTION AND REVERSALTHE MAGNETIC ANSWERVOLUME 11, FOURTH QUARTER, 1996
17171 S.E. 29th StreetChoctaw, OK 73020405-390-1444 FAX 405-390-2968405-390-1445
CANCER: THE CAUSE, PREVENTION AND REVERSAL
THE CANCER SCOURGE
Cancer is a major cause of death in the United States. Cancer is the leading cause of death in the United States under the age of 54. Cancer incidence increases with age. So far there has been no completely effective method of preventing or controlling cancer incidence. In the past 36 years, cancer has increased 36%. Two leading contributing factors to cancer are smoking and diet. Colorectal cancers are the most common cause of cancer in the industrial world. Less than one-third of the patients with colorectal cancer will survive five years. Surgery is the most effective treatment for colorectal cancer while chemotherapy is disappointing. Breast cancer was the leading cause of death in women until recently when it was surpassed by lung cancer. Lung cancer is the leading cause of death of both men and women in the United. States. Cigarette smoking is the major cause of lung cancer. Skin cancer is the most common type of malignancy. Seventy-three percent of deaths from skin cancer are from melanomas. Prostate cancer has a high incidence in men.
CANCER PREVENTION MEASURES
There are methods that are under voluntary control, which can reduce the risk factors of developing cancer. They include such as 1) no use of tobacco, 2) no use, or moderate use of alcohol, 3) optimum nutrition associated with a high fiber diet, 4) optimum exercise, 5) prevention of sunburn or even prolonged exposure to sunshine, 6) prevention and or reverse symptom maladaptive reaction to foods, chemicals or inhalants.Prevention and reversal of maladaptive reactions to foods, chemicals and inhalants has up to the present been a neglected area. The common denominator biological response to all of these maladaptive reactions is observed to be the production of acid and the reduction of oxygen (acid-hypoxia). This is highly significant since cancer can only develop in a tissue state of acid hypoxia. Tissue injuries are also acid-hypoxic. Insect sting and reptile bites are also acid-hypoxic. Microorganism infections (viral, fungal, bacterial, parasitic) are also acid-hypoxic. Since cancer can only develop in acid-hypoxic tissues any state producing acid-hypoxia is cancer promoting.
IS CANCER MULTIPLE DISEASES OR A SINGLE DISEASE?
Traditionally cancer is viewed as a multiple diseases with multiple causes and requiring multiple types of treatment of reversal. The reason for this is that there are multiple known carcinogens, multiple promoting causes, multiple tissue types of cancer and no single therapy (chemotherapy, hormone or surgery) agent effective in all cancers.The view that I have been lead to accept is that cancer is a single disease with a single common denominator cause and a single effective treatment. The single common denominator cause is acid-hypoxia and the single correction of acid-hypoxia is its replacement with alkaline-hyperoxia. Otto Warburg (1) was given a Nobel prize for demonstrating that acid-hypoxia is the condition necessary for cancer to develop and grow. Others have confirmed this (2,3). Otto Warburg considered that there was no disease whose cause was better known. Despite the fact that his findings are well published and that he considered the correct treatment for cancer was the reversal of acid-hypoxia and that these presentations were made at well established cancer research organizations such as the National Institute of Cancer, his findings have not substantially influenced medical cancer research. This research continues to look for the toxic agents that can kill cancer before it kills other human cells and to otherwise destroy the cancer by physical means or surgically remove it.M. Rose (4) observed that the energy concentrated by the body to heal or regenerate a limb in a small animal is the energy that heals cancer, this was discovered by implanting cancer at the joint of the limb of a small animal that is known to regenerate a limb and cutting this area. When the regeneration of that area occurred, the cancer died.Arthur Trappier, etal (5) demonstrated that cancer cells exposed to a negative magnetic field discourages the growth of cancer, cancer cells exposed to the positive magnetic field encourages the growth of cancer.Robert O. Becker (6) demonstrated that it is a negative electromagnetic field (negative magnetic field) that is necessary for healing to occur. The body concentrates a negative magnetic field at the site of injury for healing. An external field from a static field permanent magnet or a static field from an electromagnet of this same negative magnetic field will produce the same results as the body concentrating the negative magnetic field at the site for healing.A negative magnetic field acts directly on the bicarbonate buffer system by which a normal alkaline state can be maintained. A negative magnetic field serves as an energy activator for the oxidoreductase enzyme system, which processes free radicals, peroxides, acids, alcohols and aldehydes. A negative magnetic field releases oxygen from its bound state in these products. A negative magnetic field provides the necessary alkaline-hyperoxia that is required to reverse cancer.The normal human cell products it’s adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) energy bond by oxidative phosphorylation, which is alkaline and molecular oxygen (alkaline-hyperoxia) dependent.The cancer cells, no matter what type of tissue cells these may be produces their ATP by fermentation, which is acid-hypoxic dependent. Furthermore, fermentation cannot function in the presence of alkaline-hyperoxia. Thus the answer for the reversal of cancer is the replacement of acid-hypoxia with alkaline-hyperoxia. This what Otto Warburg says has to occur in order for cancer to be reversed.The biological response to a static negative magnetic field is the production of alkaline-hyperoxia. Thus a continuous exposure of the static negative magnetic field to a cancerous lesion reverses cancer. This irrespective of the type of cancer this might be or what it’s initiating carcinogenic cause may be. This singular fact of replacing acid-hypoxia with alkaline-hyperoxia reverses cancer. My observations are that the cancer cells do not revert back to normal cells but instead they die. Tumors that are still present after treatment with the negative magnetic field have been microscopically examined and found to be no longer neoplastic. If the tumor is a surface lesion, such as a melanoma, as the cancer tumor dies new skin will grow under the tumor and it will fall off. When microscopically examined, it is no longer carcinogenic.
GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF MAGENTIC THERAPY
Always use a negative magnetic field.LOCAL:The higher the gauss strength, the better. The more continuous the magnetic exposure, the better. The longer the duration of exposure, the better. Neodymium (ceramic or plastiform) magnets have higher gauss strength than the iron oxide plastiform magnets. The plastiform iron-oxide or neodymium materials can be stacked to increase the gauss strength.The size of the magnetic field needs to be larger than the lesion being treated. The larger the magnetic field, the deeper it’s penetration.PLACEMENT AND DURATION:Place the negative poled field of a static field permanent magnet directly over the cancerous lesion. The magnetic field needs to be larger than the lesion being treated. The 4x6x12” ceramic magnetic field penetrates deep enough to treat internal organs. The duration is 24-hours a day for a minimum of 3 months and in some cases may need to be longer. There can be brief periods of removal for taking a bath, etc. The subject should also sleep on a magnetic bed pad. Over this bed pad should be placed an egg crate type foam pad. If the breast have any sore areas, they should also be treated during the daytime by using a 5x6 inch multi-magnet flexible mat or a 5x12 inch multi-magnet flexible mat. It would be well to place a super neodymium disc magnet on top of this mat directly over the sore area or a ceramic disc, which is 1 1/2 x 3/8 inch on top of the mat directly over the sore area.
THEY WERE RIGHT
Otto Warburg was right in his assessment that cancer requires fermentation in an acid-hypoxic medium in order to develop. Otto Warburg was right in stating research in cancer prevention and reversal should focus on alkaline-hyperoxia replacing acid-hypoxia. This is the same as saying that the biological abnormal production of ATP by fermentation needs to be replaced by the normal production of ATP by oxidative phosphorylation. Otto Warburg was right in assuming that fats could increase oxidation and thus reverse cancer. Dr. Johanna Budwig was right in following up on Otto Warburg’s work using cis levofats and levosulphur containing amino acids to increase oxidation.M. Rose was right in observing that the magnetic energy concentrated in the body to heal and regenerate a limb in a small animal is the energy that heals cancer.Robert Becker was right in observing that the positive electromagnetic field is the biological signal of injury and that the electromagnetic negative field governs healing. This magnetic negative field healing effect also applies to cancer reversal (healing).Albert Roy Davis was right in observing that the biological response of exposure to a negative magnetic field is the production of alkaline-hyperoxia. Albert Roy Davis was right when he observed the reversal of cancer by exposure to a negative magnetic field.Kenneth McClain was right 22 years ago when he described to me the reversal of cancer with the use of magnetic field therapy. He phoned me stating he had some amazing findings he wished to describe to me. I was passing through New York City with a layover between planes. He came to the airport and enthusiastically described to me the reversing of cancer using static field magnetics. We have all been wrong and Otto Warburg was right. The cure for cancer is the replacement of acid-hypoxia with alkaline-hyperoxia.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
1. I am convinced that magnetic therapy for cancer will become established as a first choice. This will require sufficient, tightly controlled research statistics, which are published in peer review journals. This is a prolonged and costly process, which is in process. Current studies provide convincing information giving the rational for direction but have too many variables to satisfy critics. 2. Single isolated (non-metastatic) lesions are easily treatable with a high degree of success.3. Obstructional lesions and metastatic lesions limit success.
1) WARBURG, O., The Metabolism of Tumors. F. Dickens (Trans) London:Arnold Constable:1930 WARBURG, O. “On the Origin of Cancer Cells”. Science 123 (1956) 309-315WARBURG, O. “The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer”. Revised lecture at the meeting of the Nobel laureates on June 30, 1966. National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD 19672) TAVNOCK, T.E. Rotin, D. Acid pH in Tumors and Its Potential For Therapeutic Exploitation. Cancer Res 1989; 49:437-43843) WALTERS, R. “Enderlein Therapy: A Cancer Therapy that Promotes Gentle Self-Healing” Raum and Zeit 3 No. (1991:244) ROSE, S.M. and WALLINGFORD, H.M. SCIENCE 107 (1948): 457. Disappearance of Cancer in Regenerating Limb of Salamander.5) TRAPPIER, ARTHUR et al. “Evaluating Perspectives on the Exposure Risks From Magnetic Fields”. Journal of the National Medical Association. 82:9 September 1990.6) BECKER, R.O. and SELDON, G. “The Body Electric”. Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. William Marrow & Co. New York, 1986.BECKER, R.O., Cross Currents, Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 1990 Suggested Reading:WILLNER, ROBERT E., “The Cancer Solution”. Peltec Publishing, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida 33431, 1994DAVIS, A.R. and RAWLS, W. “The Magnetic Blueprint of Life”. Acres USA, Kansas City, MO 1979DAVIS, A.R. and RAWLS, W. “The Magnetic Effect”. Acres USA, Kansas City, MO 1975DAVIS, A.R. and RAWLS, W. “Magnetism and Its Effect on the Living System”. Acres USA, Kansas City, MO 1976FRESHT, ALAN “Enzyme Structure and Mechanism”. Second Edition. W.H. Freeman and Co. New York, New York 1994
Without promise of a cure, magnetics is worth a try!